
Themes, inspirations and content
We can witness the release of specific neurotransmitters, from the source of production to the brain, but it is a matter of debate the reason why we can translate such exchange of chemicals into an emotion that can become abstract. We know that, for example we fear pain, we seek to reproduce, we long for company of our peers. It has been a process of natural selection during centuries of evolution which has selected the creatures capable of best survival tools. The species less prompt to act on the procreation instinct, less able to team up against predators and less likely to escape from dangers, had the worse hand of cards to be able to maintain their species in favour of those who could. But the ability to turn these instincts into abstract feelings, allowing us to recognise us as capable of recognise us as individual, remember our past, make plans for our future, have knowledge of our time and its limits, fear death, even if there is no imminent danger to escape from. We can think in theory, we can estrapolate from a mere instinct sentiments and feelings like live,friendship, sadness, and all emotions we all experience in a life-time. Self-awareness has made us, a species with intrinsic disadvantages, the dominant species in our planet. We don’t have claws or teeth to defend ourselves, we are not covered with a natural layer of fur or feathers that protect us from cold weather, we are not particularly fast and our offsprings need years of care before they can be self-sufficient.. Nevertheless we managed to successfully avoid extinction and claim up to the evolution ladder. It appears that our survival is linked with our self-awareness. The great dilemma that has divided philosopher's and physics, is the provenience of this brain function. Before medicine and biology were able to demonstrate how our brain works and what it does, the belief was that us, mankind, have a soul; an invisible entity inside of us that makes us who we are. In relatively recent times, however, roughly during the 18th century, with the expanding of scientific discoveries and the active questioning of the role of a god in our make up and his eventual position in a universe no longer totally unknown, the era of materialism started. While philosopher were busy to try to find a role for this god that was beginning to appear obsoleto, physics and doctors were coming to the conclusion that the essence of our individuality is nested in the brain. It was the brain which was identified as the organ that makes us who we are.
The more physic, chemistry and medicine were advancing in their discoveries and the knowledge was expanding, the more the materialistic approach was considered the most sensible option to account for the explanation of who and what we are.
However, for the mathematicians , the puzzle was far from over. Since the beginning of the material era, mathematicians haven’t been able to translate the material principal into a mathematic formula. Any other force, phenomenon or movement was possible to be translated into mathematical language and the obtained formula was expected to be simple and elegant. Human consciousness, however, was not easy to transform into a simple and elegant formula.
With Einstein, for the very first time in history, some of the pillars of materialism was heavily shaken up. Discussing the Newtonian understanding of the G force, considering gravity as a not quite explained phenomenon and position it in a universe where time is relative to space and speed meant to begin to undo the solid dogma that the materialism had created.
The other blow came with the Quantum theory. The fact that matter was no longer tangible, no longer factual, resulted in the opening up of a Pandora’s box that nobody wanted really open. To have to accept that what it has always been consider as tangible certainty was no longer credible surely rocked the boat of materialism. the solidity of our material world turned into an elusive wave of energy in constant movement.
Traditional physicists, however, hanged to their materialism with teeth and nails. They wanted to to continue to experiment in a lab, collect data and discharge the new discoveries.
With the new information technology, some of the theoretical physicist had man-made, technological examples of what it could explain a lot about the mystery of our existence. In the meta verse, when one wears his VR headset, is plugged into another reality. The headset is the filter that enable us to take part to a different dimension. But it is laughable to identify in the VR headset as the metaverse. Any child can see that it is not. It is merely a filter that enable us to plug into a different dimension. The blueprint of the metaverse’s concept is, in fact, far more complex and sophisticated.
Now, let’s think of our brain as if it was like a VR headset. All we know about what surrounds us is filtered through our brain.what we see is not necessarily what is there, but it is an interpretation that our brain elaborates according to the information it was given. We know our surrounding because of our five senses, which are, without any doubt, imprecise, fallibile and approssimate. We don’t see reality, we see what our senses make out of what impulses they receive. This to say that objectivity is missing. We will never get to know if the red colour we see is the same colour for our neighbours. We will never prove that the taste of chocolate we love is universal or your brother still loves it but to him it may taste very different. In a nutshell, the brain is just a tool, a filter that connect us with this reality, but it is not what make us us.
I had this very long talk to create a reason to doubt our certainties.
Suffice to say that, if a mathematician take self-awareness and/or consciousness and locate it/them external to our physicality, at that point, he/she would be able to come up with that formula that was so elusive when the brain was to be the centre of the self. If consciousness is located externally, the mathematician can write a formula which is elegant and simple.
But, with this, i absolutely discourage the reader to interpret this statement as many people have already done. Because of the millennia of conditioning, we would all be prone to think that if external it has to be, then it is certainly due to the fact that there is a god. Please don’t go that far. This is not the conclusion I would like you, reader to arrive to.
The existence of god imply so many other dilemmas it wouldn’t make the dilemma any easier. Just to mention a fiew: who created god? Where was he/she when there was nothing? How did he/she manage in the absence of time? If we are told that before the Big Bang there was nothing, where was god then? And granting the assurde paradox that he/she was somewhere, he/she was surrounded by nothing, how could he/she make something out of nothing? Why did he\she bother creating a cosmo where we are insignificantly small lost in an empty universe which it may be just one of infinite others? Why didn’t he/she focused on us?
The only idea that has the intrinsic potential of creating something out of nothing is Mathematic. i have heard a detailed explanation on how the ontological mathematic can create matter out of nothing, it involves the Fourier law along with other principals and theorems. i must confess that it made sense while i was following the lesson,but my limited capacity to retain information has not kept the info at my disposal. . What i have retain is the most basic principal, which i can describe as following: to each number correspond its negative opposite, each n 1 has his opposite, -1, every 2 has its -2 every 359000321 has its -35900321. Whatever number willl return to 0.
+1 + (-1)=0 +359000321+ (-359000321)=0. All ontological mathematic (or just simply all mathematic) has its diametrically opposed negative counterpart that reduces any calculation to 0. We have recently discovered that, really simplistically put, to every atom of matter, correspond its anti-matter equivalent; every particle of energy has its opposed which reduces the particle to 0. All reality has an anti-matter equivalent to balances it down to 0. 0 contain everything even it it describes nothingness.
Zero contain EVERYTHING and NOTHING. zero, a mathematical expression, is the container of all the formulas that explain our existence and it is the only concept capable of creating something out of nothing Ontological mathematicis the essence of our existence.
Scientists theorise that the way we see this reality is not as it really happen to be. It is comparable to a computer’s desktop. We all know that our desktop presents icons which allow us to complete actions. We know, for example that by clicking on the symbol of a trash can, we get rid of documents, unwanted emails and so on. We do not believe that a trash can is really inside our laptop, however, that logo allow us to quickly complete operations at the pressing of a key. If we had to learn the program which allow our laptop to dispose of unwanted items , our action would be challenging and time consuming. Reality may fallow a similar dynamic. What we see is the simplify version of what’s really there. A mere logo, an icon. Natural selection has evolved us to see a simplify version of what surround us in order to manage it. Like in a videogame. In order to survive and pass to the next level, the player needs to kill the enemy or to collect prices or exit labyrinths. If the player was left to deal with the program itself that takes him to the next level, he would be killed or eaten by the adversary. What the player needs, it is a quick way to be able to grab the right tools to progress, without being killed or eaten. There is no need to be familiar with the program that is behind the action that make us win the game. It is documented that different species have a different input on the surrounding they live in. Colours get perceived differently, the senses are developed in a different way. We think that, because we think we are more evolved than other species, we have been given the gift of seeing the truth, but this is an overestimation of our capacities, probably a leftover of the superiority complex that religion left us with. For millennia we have been told that everything was made for us by benevolent gods (or god), that we were the favouriteof superior being that looked after us. Now we know that it is not so. Any astronomer can tell us how insignificant we are. However, the experience we live is unique in our Galaxy Probably unique in all this universe. It may not be unique, however in the next universe and the next and the next and the next for infinity. In these days, in fact, we talk about multiverse where in a never ending of nothingness there are never ending bubbles of something.. these bubbles contain many galaxies, each galaxy may contain at least one planet with the conditions for life. I am stopping here

Dimensions and connections
I don’t want to give many explanations about this work. I hope it has enough visual impact to provoke some feelings of difficulty to adjust to an elusive reality that our species suffers from. The externalisation of reality is fundamentally erroneous and it causes loneliness and erratic connections amongst the people
Watercolours and pencils on paper
Picture not framed

The party
A young man is dancing alone in the vegetation. Party is in him understanding that he is one with the environment and mankind is him and him only
Picture sold

Ganesh
An illustration of the elephant god. A wise and friendly friend to keep in good terms with
Illustration not framed

The myths of the land In a North-East of Brazil, on a burned by the sun tract of land, it is easy to confuse the reality with our own dreams, fantasies, fears and nightmares. The myth impregnate what’s real and the fantastic characters of the imagination populate the land in a sabba of domestic mysteries. These monsters are Jungian archetypal with typical characteristic of Brazil and its population
Watercolour and pencils on paper
Picture framed

Sachi’ Perere’ Another representation of the boy with one leg created by………… He is a mirror image of the demigod Hesu’: a figure translated in our western white colture as the devil, but that in the Macumba is much more complex; a bit demoniac, a bit childish. A bit domestic, a bit incredible, a bit unsettling, a bit of a joker. His evil is always more naughty that tragic. The jungle outside the household seems to threaten to take over the domestic, tamed environment.
Watercolours and pencils on paper
Picture framed - not available